Pick a part, and other bisexual misconceptions


Pick a part, and other bisexual misconceptions

Pick a part, and other bisexual misconceptions


began pinpointing as bisexual at 18 because we realized those butterflies just weren’t from me merely


planning to be buddies with that woman in my class. Since I was at a monogamous heterosexual commitment at the time, and was for the next a couple of years, it don’t prompt much exterior modification, aside from a pronoun development every now and then.

After the breakdown of stated commitment, and a number of forays abroad, we managed to have sexual experiences with both cis guys and cis ladies. Upon showing up home and discussing the news using my loved ones, the concerns we got often was actually, “just what do you ever like much more, women or men?”

The implications with this question are powerful and extensive, and ultimately originate from a failure to comprehend the complexity of gender and bisexuality.


or one, this question is impossible to answer in absolutes, and felt specially misguided in light of my recent experiences. The standard of a sexual companion is based on many aspects exterior with their genitalia. Sure, that one man was great at head, but that is to state that almost every other guy is the identical? Possibly easily had been activated more that evening, my personal experience with this lady would’ve already been better. Would I then mark it against my personal other experiences and estimate a typical? What’s the rubric right here?

A person’s experience with certain sexes is also greatly impacted by circumstance and availableness. Basically had slept with 99 females and another guy, i’d be mathematically more likely to had a lot more positive experiences with females. But those partners aren’t fundamentally amassed, because I don’t wanna rest with men 99 times out-of 100. Possibly I’m merely terrible at flirting with them.

Really don’t think We, or just about any other bisexual individual even, should be able to amass sufficient experiences to even come near determining which gender is preferable as a sexual partner with any precision.


he transphobic undertones of your question are also impractical to disregard. It removes trans and non-binary individuals, and also the concern itself trades from the proven fact that every individual within a certain sex operates inside the same enchanting and intimate patterns, which is just untrue.

It was thus bizarre in my opinion that I happened to be expected this question the moment my experience diverged through the heterosexual norm; as though intercourse with one girl implied gender with all of females. While commonalities can positively appear, it certainly not attracts solid outlines on how all cis men and cis women behave as associates.

The idea that genitals have a direct connection to performance in bed is not only very transphobic, it’s a great disservice into the range and selection of all humankind. The very reason we look for new-people would be that they have new things to show and gives to us. You will find gender with others, perhaps not best caricatures of a particular intersection of genitals and gender expression.


he notion of a gender inclination in queer people has also felt exceptionally bi-phobic if you ask me. It genuinely just is like another attempt for mono-attracted people to press us towards one section of the spectrum, so they really defintely won’t be strained with nuance.

Basically desired the organization of women, I would become your neighbourhood gay, and if I happened to be only into males, you can write off my same-sex destination as a moment spot to my general straightness.

One of the most perplexing items to me happens when mono-attracted people make an effort to align my encounters due to their own to make it much more digestible, once the extremely advantage of variety is actually complexity.


t in addition actively works to address bisexuality, pansexuality and queerness as a numbers game. The feared “30% homosexual and 70per cent right” identifier is yet another example of mono-attracted people thrusting their particular identities onto our own to really make it better to understand. In reality, it’s a more nuanced and cumulative experience. I will be 100per cent queer; don’t reduce me personally up unto portions of one’s own identity.

It’s this reductionist and binary believing that has caused us to shrink away from identify as bi, in lieu of queer. Before I realized I found myself bi, the chief shield between same-sex and opposite-sex appeal had been genitals.

Since that’s no further a problem, it offers me personally contemplating just what actually comprises a gender beyond identity.


age all fulfil these unique sexual functions your sole common bond I am able to draw between experiences is actually my partner’s sex. Each companion is actually a sexual character in their right, which will ben’t inherently associated with what’s between their own feet or the way they prove.

Asking queer individuals to select a part is reductionist, binary, transphobic and absolutely nothing short of an impossible job. All we ask is you embrace the complexity of gender and sex and stop trying to nail it into equivalencies. We don’t identify to you for any very reason why we do not easily fit into the framework; kindly stop trying to shove all of us back in there.

Liza is a 21 year old college student and author based in Shanghai. When she’s perhaps not authoring becoming a queer, mixed-raced lady residing abroad, she scrolls through memes and contemplates death


We are here to help. Please use our online form to ask for a quotation within 6 hours.